By Roger Weber
Based on the "team money and wins" project and the trend line that matches it, here are the 2006 standings realigned based on who best spent money, or at least
which teams most outperformed an average team that would spend that same amount of money on player salaries.
TOR |
5 |
NYY |
1.5 |
BOS |
-2.9 |
TB |
-11.2 |
BAL |
-12.2 |
|
|
MIN |
15.8 |
DET |
11.1 |
CWS |
3.2 |
CLE |
-0.6 |
KC |
-14.2 |
|
|
OAK |
13.1 |
LAA |
2.2 |
TEX |
-1.2 |
SEA |
-6.7 |
|
|
FLA |
17.3 |
NYM |
10.4 |
PHI |
0.3 |
ATL |
-6 |
WAS |
-9.2 |
|
|
CIN |
0.3 |
STL |
-1.8 |
HOU |
-3.4 |
MIL |
-4 |
PIT |
-9.2 |
CHC |
-19.6 |
|
|
SD |
6.8 |
LAD |
1.8 |
COL |
1.7 |
ARI |
-3.5 |
SF |
-9 |